EN 5 Second Review:
One of the funniest movies in years, not for everyone,
but for every guy under 40 for sure.
"Quite
a few laughs, although there are times when it verges on crossing the
line"
Peter Veugelaers:
Entertainmentnutz.com

Although arguably the best laughs you’ll get all year round, Borat
is nevertheless controversial. It’s the style of its naïve television
reporter, though, which generates guffaws and not the suspected
offensiveness. Kazakh reporter Borat Sagdiyev, played by Ali G
incarnation and British comedian Sacha Baron Cohen, displays an innocent
cheekiness and formidable naivety about stepping on people’s toes, which
inevitably has got this film into hot water, exposing how offended
people were, especially in today’s politically correct milieu.
This mockumentary
premise is precisely a great hook. A T.V. reporter from a village area
of Kazakhstan goes, with his producer, in search of real America among
mostly ordinary folk there. Borat provides hilarious leverage between
him and the real people he interviews. His only information about
America is through what he sees in these people. That includes momentum
to the storyline, a Baywatch magazine he picks up in a garage
sale, which inspires him to go to California to marry Pamela Anderson.
At home, Borat is a
polygamist, his sister is a prostitute, they have a festival called the
running of the Jew, and they yell and jibe at one another as a natural
part of their interaction, so that’s normal according to the movie.
In the “U.S. of A” (as
Borat affectionately emphasises) the people he interviews include
feminists, officials, and a raft of everyday folk including a cowboy
(who decried Muslims), caring pastors, kindly Jewish folk, and loudy
teenagers on a drinking binge.
A beauty of the humour
of this doco-mock-comedy is how susceptible the interviewees were and
how seriously they interpreted his usually awkward questions, leading to
inevitable showdowns at times. Unfortunately, the downside of the making
of this mockumentary has led to real lives being affected, such as the
producer of a T.V show which interviewed the fictional Borat on the
pretence it was real. She got fired. Others are filing lawsuits.
Which leaves me
wondering about how sensitive people are to how they are viewed in the
media, and whether it is all that powerful.
In response to
anti-Semitic criticism Cohen, a Jew, said in Neil Strauss’ Rolling
Stone article, “Borat essentially works a
tool. By himself pretending to be anti-Semitic, he lets people lower
their guard and expose their own prejudice. When I was in university,
there was this major historian of the Third Reich, Ian Kershaw, who
said, ‘The path to Auschwitz was paved with indifference’. I know it’s
not very funny being a comedian talking about the Holocaust, but it’s an
interesting idea that not everyone in Germany had to be a raving
anti-Semite. They just had to be apathetic”.
These intentions are not
clear through out watching the movie – Borat comes across deliberately
clever – you notice the comedian – while maintaining an air of naivety
and simplicity, which doesn’t work to expose prejudice in audiences, if
that is indeed possible. And with the amount of controversy the movie
has engaged, such as the justified telling off about how Kazakhstan is
misrepresented, the aim has gone by the wayside. You have to ask,
therefore, from a viewer’s perspective, what’s the point? Quite a few
laughs, although there are times when it verges on crossing the line for
this reviewer leaving me in doubt about the point of the comedy. I’m not
alone, it seems.